QDIS Blog

A blog about chemistry, drug development, science, and technology

February 28, 2007

FDA Cuts Food Inspections?!

by @ 1:19 pm.  Filed under Health News, FDA

The AP had a nice report this week related to food safety and the FDA.

FDA cuts food inspections by half

They report that over the last three years, food safety inspections have dropped in half! Here are some other startling facts from their investigation:

- There are 12 percent fewer FDA employees in field offices who concentrate on food issues.
- Safety tests for U.S.-produced food have dropped nearly 75 percent, from 9,748 in 2003 to 2,455 last year, according to the agency’s own statistics.

After Sept 11, 2001 the FDA urged increasing food inspection and that did indeed happen and peaked in 2003 but have fallen back and erased those gains.

I have stated before that given the number of high profile cases in the last year, there will be increased scrutiny in this area, especially from Congress. I would not at all be surprised by a hearing on this sometime before the summer. The problem is, there are many other areas of higher priority now such as the war in Iraq.

The budget for next year does include modest gains for food safety of $10.6 million, but most critics agree this is only a very small portion of what is really needed to do their job properly. Some claim that as much as ten times that amount would be necessary.

The FDA Commissioner had his to say.

“We’re applying resources to targeted areas. So in a way, it’s not a matter of ‘Are you inspecting one out of 100 or 10 out of 100?’ The real issue is if you can define risk. Are you applying the 10 inspectors to the 10 areas of concern? Then it’s essentially you’re covering 100 percent of your problem, which is not covering 100 percent of the universe,” FDA commissioner Dr. Andrew von Eschenbach said.

While this is a good goal and I am a advocate of risk based assessment, it ignores the fact that some risks exist that we do not know about. In the case of the lettuce e.coli problems it may be that a feral pig defecated in the field and that was the source of the contamination. I doubt anyone would have had that on their list of criteria for risk assessment.

Technorati Tags: ,

Email Ed Vawter



Related Posts:
  • President Seeks $78 Billion Cut on Healthcare Over Five Years
  • Regulation of Foreign API Manufacturers
  • Major Job Cuts in Big Pharma
  • Dendreon will delay Provenge, cuts jobs
  • More Food Safety Problems. This Time It’s an Olive Garden in Indiana

  • Bookmark it with: | del.icio.us del.icio.us | Digg It Digg it | Furl Furl | Simpy Simpy | Spurl Spurl | My! Yahoo My Yahoo! |

    Leave a Reply

    [powered by WordPress.]

    QDIS: blogging about chemistry, drug development, science and technology.

    Internal Links

    Categories

    Search This Blog

    Archives

    February 2007
    S M T W T F S
    « Jan   Mar »
     123
    45678910
    11121314151617
    18192021222324
    25262728  

    Search Entire Site

    Subscribe (It's Free!)

    Performancing

    Chemistry, science, and technology for the future.

    logo2

    General Links

    Blog Links

    Chemistry Journal Feeds

    Chemistry Feeds

    35 queries. 1.097 seconds